Is it possible to find any common ground between different identities Research Proposal

Is it possible to find any common ground mingled with different identities in Turkey via Rawls theories - Research Proposal ExampleIntroduction Conflict has always existed in society and it always allow for. It is an instance which is not straight a result or victim of any social phenomenon or occurrence, but rather a combination of factors over time. Theorists have come to cogitate that contributions to an engaged, politically aware form of multicultural theorizing may cast some light on political debate and public policy making. Not surprisingly, determinate liberals such as Hayek (1976) insist that the present-day(a) liberal fixation on the mirage of social justice leads them to ignore the way that freedom depends on a decentralise market based on private property, the overall results of which are unpredictable. Similarly, Robert Nozick (1974 160ff) famously argued that attempts to ensure that market transactions conform to a specific pattern of holdings will involve consta nt interferences with item-by-item freedom. No idealistic policy will address all of the needs of everyone, but instead will institute the great good for society. A utopian society is the society that accepts this fact. A nation whose people are in riotous turmoil, such as Turkey, challenges this truth declaring mankind nature and human imperfections as unjust. Not only so-and-so human rights be violated, but also used to exploit or institute different agendas. John Rawls overtakes human rights as being constructed by reasonable people living together in a society. Rawls presents a more compassionate run into of human rights, one with the greatest degrees of individual liberty and equality, while maintaining these rights for all. The state should distribute every liaison, including benefits, equally unless an unequal distribution would benefit the poorer classes. The work of John Rawls is suddenly central in terms of the nature of reason, equality, justice or pluralism. It i nspired us to consider how his principles might actually enlighten political issues arising in contemporary liberal democratic societies. The values of a governing agency can contrast with the personal values of the people. In many instances, only the outcome can determine whether the decisions were the right ones. In some instances, none of the choices seem appropriate. Regardless of the size or impact of the conflict, ethical decisions challenge the best of us, and the right thing to do may elude common logic. This paper will address cultural diversity in the Turkish society and the view of John Rawls view of justice as a political conception. 1.1 Multiculturalism Multiculturalism is one of the most controversial issues of social justice in liberal democracies. Government and financial entities consist of culture, environment, strategies, and traits. The take aim of Values are reflected in a countrys culture. The most changing attributes are culture and traits. Cultures, traits a nd environments deviate from time to time, but not so far as to lose their original attributes. According to Cheeseman, the following standards should be implemented at all times (Cheeseman, 2010) Keep the peace and shape chaste standards Promote social justice and maintain status quo Facilitate planning and orderly change Provide basis for compromise 90% Maximize individual freedom Minorities increasingly demand recognition and in some cases special rights and these demands are demands of justice. The line of