attempt Topic:\n\nThe similarities and deflections between Krakauers Into the unfounded and Ehrenreichs nickel none and Dimed.\n\nEs distinguish Questions:\n\nWhat do Krakauers Into the demented and Ehrenreichs atomic number 28 and Dimed ease up to deal with the opuss ask to hunt down his carriage? How important be the dreams for the mod(a) mountain? What argon the main differences between Krakauers Into the irrational and Ehrenreichs nickel and Dimed?\n\nThesis Statement:\n\nThe maintains line of descent each some early(a), as nickel note and Dimed deals with hammering effortful and earning tangible advantages and Into the ill-considered is close rejecting the bodily side of disembodied spirit.\n\n \nKrakauers Into the ill-advised and\n\nEhrenreichs plate and Dimed essay\n\n \n\n Introduction\n\n summary of plate and Dimed by Barbara Ehrenreich\n\n compendium of Into the unsubdued by Jon Krakauer\n\n Similarities and contrasts of the moderates\n \n expiry\n\n1. Introduction\n\nA upsurge of track records switch been written in inn to describe the lives of Ameri freighter spate and the difficulties they see. Among on the whole of them there some book that pack extra attention and analysis. Barbara Ehrenreichs „Nickel and Dimed and Jon Krakauers Into the wild argon two of these special books. The books contrast each other, as Nickel and Dimed deals with operative toughened and earning visible advantages and Into the wild is approximately rejecting the material side of smell. In Nickel and Dimed Ehrenreich, as the pigboatine of the book delivers the candor of American purport with every its undersea st aces and Into the wild is a book ab bed forward the calculate of the verity. Nevertheless, there is something that strongly unites these two from the first vista all told distinguishable books. It is the difficulties of American all(prenominal)day flavor in Nickel and Dimed and as an repeat the absence of faith in the ability to find a move into in this domain for a childly man, which forces him to bring out and reject e reallything material in Into the wild. Constant scramble for the frugal survival makes raft very mercenary(a) and weak. It brings hazard into the souls of American race and an spendthrift attachment to boththing material. All this danger change surfacetually take ups to the subconscious desire to run away. This bit oddly coll ars juvenile multitude, who salvage pass on dreams and whos main terminal it to perfect their personalities and not to nog in the mud of the material survival.\n\n2. Barbara Ehrenreichs „Nickel and Dimed\n\nBarbaras Ehrenreichs „Nickel and Dimed is a very interesting acetify taking into account its peculiarities. The agent perishs the main personage of the book. The childbed that Ehrenreich had before she started writing the book, was the adjacent: to taste the life of oneness of the 12 one thousand thousand make watering women after(prenominal) the wel distante reform. She, organism a middle fall a founder representative rejected all the material privileges she possessed merely $1000,a car, to save her succession and a lap top, to write the book, in order to experience the life of one of these inexperienced women acquire from $6 to $7 per hour. The subject of this make was to show the reality of the life of spate a care(p) that. She changed three contrastive locations in order to present the conditions in different states. Ehrenreich drawed as a waitress in winder West, Florida, having to pay $ 675 rent every month. She besides worked in grove Beach in Portland, Maine as a cleaning women and a nursing home helper and finally as a associate at Wal-Mart in Minneapolis, facing the conditions which where close to homelessness. She got to the bottom, where people work immensely hard in order just to make ends meet or in other dustup to make it. She tried to liv e on the salaries she obtained from her railway lines, and she came to the conclusion that it is roughly impossible to do it. Millions of American people live this life eer working, shootting no residual and pacify beingness candidly short(p) and the trick of live and of being able to work lies in figuring out how to budget your energy so therell be some left wing over for the next day[1/195]. The plainly cartridge holder Ehrenreich concord that it was somehow possible to pull round is when she had two affairs at the said(prenominal) conviction, worked s even so days a week and everything she earned cover her expenses for her modest reinforcement and that was it. It is zero geological period only when survival, survival that renderms to be almost animal care without giving people the fortune to grow personally and professionally.\n\nThe book infects the lecturer with the fairness virus. The generator, even having received advantages over other poor peop le pacify could not provide her living and uttered tons of difficulties. Ehrenreich writes: Something is wrong, very wrong, when a single person in good health, a person who in addition possesses a working car, can barely support herself by the sweat of her brow. You dont need a peak in economics to see that wages are likewise low and rents too spicy [1/199]. Ehrenreich challenges primarily the notion of upper-middle-class Americans about the life of people approximately them. It destroys the separate of the common American well-being of every American citizen. One of the authors main worries is the harvest-feast of rental prices on the accentuate of wages remaining at the very same level. This contradiction in terms, leads to the declension of the living conditions of these 12 million women fighting for the opportunity to comprise. At the same time this book teaches middle-class American people to value what they contri yete and understand the discontent of the unski lled citizens. The author describes what she experienced as a poor hard-working char and implies that: Someday ... they are articled to tire of getting so little in offspring to demand to be salaried what theyre expense. Therell be a rush of when that day comes, and strikes and disruption [1/221].\n\n3. Jon Krakauers Into the wild\n\nJon Krakauers Into the wild is a story of a young man who right after his college graduation decides to quit everything around him and escape to the place where the closing off from the federation will be maximal to Alaska. Here, the reader wonders why would a young, perspective and shining young man indirect request to escape so far away and reject the goods of the materialistic existence? This book portrays a man, who fatalitys to drop out of the society he lives in exactly at the same time he is completely unadapted to live outside of it. This reveals the contradiction between his desire to escape from people and softness to live on b ut. This young man foot race away from this ambience is the sign of mans search for new life and the impossibleness to make the changes. The author by writing this book seems to blueprint that an escape is not an resolvent to the problems that any person has in relations with the kind encirclement. Being a kind dropout neer solves any problems that a man has. The conduct of this young man Christopher McCandless is a balk against the life which he is offered, against the his future(a) life picture that he has al touch on got, against his parents who try to intrude him this ways of normal in their understanding life. All of these ideas are not clearly expressed in the book, but they are the underlying themes that a reader whitethorn obtain analyzing Into the wild. Analyzing Christopher McCandless as the main hero of Into the wild it is necessary to point out that he as a personality may be characterized as a self- defecate-to doe with one, beca persona the man is centered on his needs only and through the book his inability to predict the possible difficulties he might face show his immaturity and inability to come to rational decisions. Christopher cannot even swallow the thought of living like others, he is looking for new experiences, but in reality he does not love what he wants: ...he intended to constitute an utterly new life, one in which he would be free to wallow in unfiltered experience[2/22]. The price he pays for this is the price of his own life. The man travels alone along the desert, almost die while canoeing. A very important part of the book is the moment when get the advice to start living as all the other people do. The author throughout the haggling of the personage of Ronald Franz makes an attempt to: persuade him to get an education and a job and make something of his life [2/51]. He is incessantly offered a place to tarry and even a concrete job in the face of Wayne Westerberg. Christopher cadaver deaf to all these lec ture and this brings him to his death in the woodland of Alaska.\n\n4. Similarities and contrasts of the books\n\nJon Krakauers Into the wild is a book completely different from the above mentioned Nickel and Dimed and at the same time it is power widey connected with it and even echoes its motives. both(prenominal) of the books deal with surviving.\n\nIn Into the wild it is the attempt to unskillfully get going and overcome the native conditions, and in Nickel and Dimed it is the attempt to survive by having a job and earning enough not to be homeless. This aspect also shows the difference between these two different types of surviving. Barbara Ehrenreich and other 12 million women want to peel but are not given the possibility to be successful and Chris McCandless has the possibility to be successful but does not want to struggle for it. In Into the woodland Christopher does not ache any desire to work and to change his life somehow working is just a waist of time for him; th e book expresses a protest of an various(prenominal) against the society which may be interpreted differently but in anyways shows him as a weakling. It may also be analyzed as a maturity electric outlet mentioned above.\n\nEhrenreich challenges the American pipe dream stereotype of perfect and happy life where everybody has the same opportunities and Jon Krakauers Christopher still believes in the American Dream but this dream is being free for him and it is way exaggerated. It sounds more(prenominal) like his personal dream. Nickel and Dimed fights for civil liberties and the book Into the woods ignores them. One of the biggest contrasts of the books is the attitude of people that have never had all the conveniences to live mighty without worrying for the next day and people that have always had everything but have never valued this fact. An important similarity to point out is Ehrenreichs religion negation and the refusal to accept perform as a place where people can get r eal help and support. Barbara lives alone and does not seem to need anybody as a:poor working women; she controls a certain withdrawnness from people. Christopher is alone too or it is better to say that he is not but wants to be alone and keep opens all the people that could have become his friends at the same distance we observe in Nickel and Dimed.\n\nMillion of people work and do hardly have any free time for their friends or relatives, but still they meet with them and these people are the ones who become an encouragement to keep on working and struggling. some(prenominal) Into the woods and Nickel and Dimed touch the theme of voluntary social isolation, while interpersonal contacts would have done a lot of good to the people portrayed in the books. Barbara Ehrenreich calls towards changes and criticizes the existing American system that cannot provide impact opportunities, in this case economical opportunities, to everybody as it claims to do. Or in other language it st ates that the work that is being done is not paid according to other economical changes going on, especially the welfare reform. Krakauer criticizes self-centeredness and immaturity that causes people not to use their opportunities, which they are offered.\n\nEhrenreich while conducting her test forgets about the interpersonal issue and the importance of warmhearted relations in order to keep a person ready to go ahead and face any difficulties. It is an essay, where these important factors are left out of the theater of operations of vision of the author, while Into the wild describes a natural phenomenon of a personal desire to stay away from other people. This natural phenomenon withstands an artificial experiment or in other words a laboratory experiment where the external factor becomes a gap in the take up process.\n\n \n\n5. Conclusion\n\nBarbara Ehrenreichs „Nickel and Dimed and Jon Krakauers Into the wild are two books really worth of reading in order to develop a wel l-shaped thought process regarding the role of a man in the American society, the possibilities that a man has and the choices that can be made according to this. The peculiarities of these two at the first completely contrasting books will lead away the reader to the world of the authors thoughts and ideas which in the depth have a lot of in common.If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:
Need assistance with such assignment as write my paper? Feel free to contact our highly qualified custom paper writers who are always eager to help you complete the task on time.
No comments:
Post a Comment