Man, as a creature, is inherently bored. Since the dawn of time, it has been the natural theme of man to find alternative methods to enhance his being. The many heart and soul by which man has turned to include sex, gambling, and the consumption of substances beyond the requirements of nutrition. The consumption of substances can be further broken imbibe into ratified and smuggled substances. The question thus becomes, who are we to derriere labels on certain substances by deeming them legal and prohibit others by creating penalties for their use? The issue of prohibition is certainly not a new one to our nation. In 1919, the eighteenth Amendment prohibited the manufacture, trade wind or transportation of inebriantic beverages. Suddenly honest, responsible Americans who just extremityed a drink, were turned into criminals. Respectable bars became underground speak-easys, and legitimate liquor manufacturers were replaced by criminal bootleggers. Gang war uttermoste, bri bery, and criminal activity reached an all-time high. Standards on illegal inebriant were a component pull down than those on the previously legal alcohol which take to the glaring or death of many consumers. Finally in 1933, politicians buckled and repealed the 18th Amendment. The proscription attempt of the early 20th century provides the consummate(a) historical support for the decriminalization of drugs. Prohibition will work coarse injury to the flummox of temperance. It is a species of intemperance within itself, for it goes beyond the bounds of reason in that it attempts to control a mans appetence by legislation, and makes a shame erupt of things that are not crimes. A Prohibition law strikes a blow at the very principles upon which our g all overnment was founded. The rise in flushed crime over the years has been a concern to most.
A major(ip) cause of this increase in crime is the illegal trafficking of drugs. As violent... I ascertain with the direction your going in. I severely believe in free will, and when compared to THE LESSER OF THE EVILS I personally feel that rock-steady ol Mary Jane is alot less dangerious than alcohol. When is the last time you heard of anyone acquiring killed over a joint? The worse Ive ever seen is that a man will eat himself let out of house and home. A pot smoker is by far a lot less dangerious than an alcoholic, and alcohol is legal. The biggest problem to over come is the alcohol lobiest who represent thier product and fight to throttle pot illegal because they know that for it to be come legal would regard as losing millions of dollars in alcohol sales. GOOD ISSUE TO ARGUE !!! If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper